DSLR Bodies: Don't count Nikon and Canon out

One last Tom bit for the day:

Don’t count Canon and Nikon out. They can see what’s happening. They know they need to respond, and they almost certainly will. But in my book, responding sooner is far better than responding later. Sooner has already passed.

Indeed, there is a huge bulk of Nikon/Canon users who drift to mirrorless for the express reason that neither company yet have a mirrorless camera system that does what their crop or FF dSLR systems can do. 

I am part of that cohort. 

I had high hopes for the Df. In the end, it was not the digital FM/E that many had hoped for. It was too large, too heavy, and too complicated to resemble the haptic coup d'état that was the 1970's SLR. It tried to please too many disparate elements. 

Still, Nikon/Canon's current mirrorless systems are experiments. They are the big 2's Apple TV.

Unlike doomsayers, I believe this will only drive eventual sales of yet-to-come flagship mirrorless cameras from either company. They are waiting to get it right. Currently, Fujifilm's X-T1 and Olympus OMD-E1 are the closest mirrorless system cameras to providing the experience of shooting a digital SLR in the package of a film SLR. They are the current haptic leaders.

But haptics don't count for much in the current mirrorless world. The furore the Sony a7r caused is proof of that. Again, the a7r is a fine image maker, but it fails to deliver the essentials of image taking. The good news is: if you can get on with a Sony a7r, you can get on with anything.

Not counting Nikon/Canon out means realising that the big 2 have aces up their sleeves. They will not release flagship mirrorless designs with as many holes as the A7/r. They can't afford to.

Goodbye, Cameras: by Craig Mod

The increasingly connected camera works wonders for still life photography. For me, the Sony a7r's biggest failing is that it doesn't act like a simple light-capturing box. Its menu system is far more convoluted than the D800's and the camera is far more complicated to operate. But for the still life photographer, its benefits far outweigh the ridiculous oversights.

Craig Mod's New Yorker article blubs reasonably about the true camera, about the true photographer, about the true photograph. How each are pulled together are pulled together is the story of photography. The simpler the device, the better it becomes at sharing the story.

It’s clear now that the Nikon D70 and its ilk were a stopgap between that old Leica M3 that I coveted over a decade ago and the smartphones we photograph with today. Tracing the evolution from the Nikon 8008 to the Nikon D70 to the GX1, we see cameras transitioning into what they were bound to become: networked lenses. Susan Sontag once said, “While there appears to be nothing that photography can’t devour, whatever can’t be photographed becomes less important.” Today, it turns out, it’s whatever can’t be networked that becomes less important.
Source: http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/elem...